Lauren Owen, “The
Quick” (Random House, 2014)
It’s a bad sign that my immediate reaction to The Quick is
to tell you about other books. Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell seems to have set the bar high for
revisionist Victorian tales of the fantastic.
Of course there are a host of writers & novels that approach genre
tropes from a literary angle. That’s
probably more a case of pick your poison rather than determining the one that
is the most typical.
The Quick starts off telling a very Victorian tale of two
siblings who grow up on a great house in decline. The brother and sister are separated
eventually. He is sent off to school,
while she lives with an elderly relative.
Later, he moves to London, where he falls in love and eventually runs
afoul of a nasty group of vampires.
Oops! Was I not supposed to use that word? Maybe not… Owen seems to go to great pains to
avoid the word. Why? I’m not sure.
Even in-book, characters seem to be aware of vampires and have a
tradition of stories about them. Like
our world, these creatures are thought of as beings of fiction and
folklore. But there doesn’t seem to be
any discussion of “they can’t exist” or what have you. The avoidance of the word seems to be more
designed to distance The Quick from
its low rent genre cousins.
Unfortunately, those embarrassing cousins have a few things
right. If you’re writing a Victorian pot
boiler, make the pot boil! Give us real
tension and action! If you’re giving us characters, make some of them
likeable! Owen’s narrative choices mean
that we spend far too much time in the heads of unlikeable or at best
irritating characters.
What sounds like an interesting exploration of Victorian
London rife with monsters somehow turns into a boring slog. It lacks the courage of its own
convictions. Perhaps next time a
stronger embrace of genre elements would make for a more compelling tale.
No comments:
Post a Comment